...there are distinct things that can be related, but it makes no sense at all if the distinction of thingness, itself, is a nonsense. Once the wholeness underlying imaginary separateness is seen, one can say, "With my little finger I move the entire universe," and other similar statements, that will appear nonsensical from a conventional thing-oriented perspective.
The multiple universe theory, the interpretation of the double slit experiment, and all other ideas based upon the assumption of thingness/separateness collapse when wholeness or oneness is seen to be the case. There is only THIS, alone, here and now, but even this statement is untrue, and is a pointer, only. I am sure that E., like several people who post here, has no beliefs of any kind. This pathless path leads to the end of all beliefs.
The multiple universe theory, the interpretation of the double slit experiment, and all other ideas based upon the assumption of thingness/separateness collapse when wholeness or oneness is seen to be the case. There is only THIS, alone, here and now, but even this statement is untrue, and is a pointer, only. I am sure that E., like several people who post here, has no beliefs of any kind. This pathless path leads to the end of all beliefs.
